|
Nosy
Rosy intends paying a visit to
the baboons who are under the care of Jenni Trethowan
and 'walk with baboons.' I heard
from a very reliable source that it is
an
amazing experience at only R250
p/person.
Watch this space for a full article.
CAPE PENINSULA BABOON RESEARCH UNIT
The Cape Peninsula Baboon Research Unit
is a collection of scientists focusing
their research on baboons of the Cape
Peninsula and surrounding areas. This
research encompasses various aspects of
baboon biology, including ecology,
behaviour, genetics and evolution. Much
of this research focuses on comparing
the Cape Peninsula population to other
baboon populations and studying the
relationship between the Peninsula
baboons and their human neighbours.
Current research topics include ranging
patterns, habitat use, effect of human
habitation on baboon behaviour and
ecology, parasite transmission between
baboons and humans, population genetics,
and male and female reproductive
strategies.
The Cape Peninsula baboon population
consists of 11 troops, distributed from
the Tokai Forest in the southern suburbs
of Cape Town down to the Cape of Good
Hope Section of the Table Mountain
National Park. These troops vary in size
from about 7 individuals to over 100.
The baboon population is under
increasing pressure from human
habitation, which has decreased and
fragmented the baboon habitat in the
Peninsula, and conflict between humans
and baboons is prevalent. Part of our
goal as a research group is to
contribute information on baboon biology
that will aid in baboon conservation and
management.
Research
The research of the BRU encompasses the
following general areas:
• Behavioural Ecology — Feeding ecology
and activity patterns.
• Spatial Ecology — Habitat use and
ranging patterns.
• Social Behaviour — Grooming patterns
and social relationships.
• Genetics — Population genetics and
kinship.
• Physiology — Hormonal correlates of
behaviour.
Baboon Management
Research conducted by the BRU informs
management of the Cape Peninsula baboon
population. Significant interaction with
humans characterizes most of the baboon
troops of the Cape Peninsula. The
problems associated with this
interaction led to the creation of the
Baboon Management Team (BMT) in 1998.
The BMT includes representatives from
South African National Parks; Cape
Nature; the City of Cape Town; various
residents' associations in the southern
suburbs of Cape Town and the Cape
Peninsula; and scientists from the
Baboon Research Unit. Our role is to
contribute information to the BMT that
can aid in management decisions. The
official liaison between the Baboon
Management Team and the Baboon Research
Unit is Esmé Beamish.
Philosophy
Through collaborative research, we aim
to gain insight into baboon biology and
behaviour while contributing positively
to baboon management in the South
African Cape Peninsula.
________________________________________
Baboons and Humans
Baboons are among the most behaviourally
flexible, adaptable, and intelligent
mammals and thus become very easily
commensal with humans. If they are fed
by humans or otherwise learn that they
can obtain food from them, baboons will
decrease their efforts to find natural
foods and will become increasingly
daring in their attempts to get an "easy
meal." The end result is that baboons
will turn aggressive, will be identified
as "problem animals," and will be
killed.
As of 1999, the Baboon Management Team (BMT)
and SANParks have employed "baboon
monitors" to prevent baboons from
entering residential areas as well as to
move baboons out of human-frequented
areas before conflict occurs.
If you are a Cape Peninsula resident and
would like to report a baboon-related
problem outside of Table Mountain
National Park (Tokai, Kommetjie, Fish
Hoek, Scarborough, and Simon’s Town
areas), please contact Jenni Trethowan,
who manages the baboon monitors, at
021-782-2015. If you would like to
report illegal activity involving
baboons (e.g., feeding or injuring
baboons), please contact Cape Nature at
021-957-5900 (or visit their website:
www.capenature.org.za).
________________________________________
Related links
• BaboonsOnline.com
• SANParks
• Cape Nature
• UCT Department of Zoology
• UCT Department of Archaeology
• NYCEP Graduate Program in Evolutionary
Primatology
________________________________________
Copyright © 2007 Baboon Research Unit
Site designed and maintained by Julian
Saunders
Updated: 15 September 2007
CAPENATURE’S POSITION STATEMENT WITH
REGARD TO THE MANAGEMENT OF
“PROBLEMATIC” PRIMATES IN URBAN AREAS OF
THE WESTERN CAPE
In terms of the Constitution of South
Africa, citizens of the Republic have
basic human rights to a healthy and safe
environment within which to live in. The
different spheres of government have
certain obligations to ensure that these
basic rights are provided and maintained
at all times. In general, the common
law’s position on all wild animals is
that of res nullius. This means that no
wild animal in a free-roaming state has
a legal owner. They belong to no one in
particular but to everyone in general.
The only means by which any person can
obtain ownership of any wild animal is
either by means of live capture and
thereafter exercising control thereof or
by keeping it in captivity within a
secure enclosure or legalized by killing
(hunting). If ownership within the legal
fragments exists, then such owners can
be held liable in cases where these
animals escape from that property and
cause damage to any other property.
Nature Conservation organs of state or
other environmental statutes regulate
such ownership and the utilisation,
including the control and management
actions, with regard to wild animals in
South Africa. In the Cape Peninsula and
Overstrand Local Authority area,
conflict between humans and the baboon
troops, which are free-ranging in
suitable habitats on the edges of urban
developments, occasionally does arise.
The underlying conservation principle
which addresses these problems that
wildlife resources effectively have
prior rights in that they evolved in
these areas and existed there prior to
conversion of the land for urban
development. A holistic approach to
address these “problems” is being
advocated by CapeNature and preventative
measures must be put into place to
address the wildlife – human conflict
efficiently. This approach, which
addresses the problem rather than the
“problem animal”, is now the standard
way in which such conflict between
humans and wildlife in urban areas and
rural areas should be addressed.
Therefore landowners and other property
owners need to take reasonable steps to
protect their property and other
interests from being damaged or utilized
by naturally- occurring baboon troops.
In urban areas, pro-active measures to
manage baboon problems are very
important, and could include, for
example, the identification of baboon
hotspots; the establishment of proper
signage and educational measures (the
purpose being to change the attitude of
humans in addressing the problem). The
use of baboon monitors; electric
fencing; burglar bars in front of
windows and safety doors to prevent
primates from entering human dwellings;
baboon-proof dustbins and proper waste
management strategies by local
authorities; and, where feasible
conditioned taste and/or sound aversion;
etc.
However, CapeNature Conservation
recognizes that occasionally, despite
taking such preventative measures,
certain individual animals are repeat
offenders which manage to circumvent the
protective measures taken. Animals which
learn to overcome these measures, are
usually those generally considered to
have relatively high levels of
intelligence such as primates. When
satisfactory evidence has been provided
that despite taking the correct
appropriate precautionary measures, in
an appropriate or prescribed manner to
prevent or minimize such damage/loss,
only then is it reasonable to take
further measures to attempt to solve the
problem, such as cage-trapping or other
appropriate management actions.
The onus, however, remains on the
landowner/property owner to demonstrate
that he/she applied the preventative
measures in a reasonable and responsible
manner. Under such circumstances the
animals which are caught can potentially
be considered for further management
intervention, including translocation,
euthanasia, or utilization for other
purposes. The hunting of wild animals is
regulated in terms of the Nature
Conservation Ordinance 19 of 1974 as
amended and the hunting proclamation
that is promulgated annually. Chacma
baboons (Papio ursinus) are the most
abundant wild primates within the south
western Cape and cause merely specific
problems on the edges of human
settlements and the hunting proclamation
makes provision for certain
circumstances.
The hunting season for this species is
open for the whole year, and an
unlimited number of animals may be
hunted daily, while prohibited hunting
methods such as (1) hunting with the aid
of artificial light; (2) hunting only by
means of a cage trap; (3) hunting during
the period one hour after sunset on any
day and one hour before sunrise on the
following day; and (4) hunting by the
use of a dog, are suspended in terms of
the hunting proclamation. It is
important to take cognisance of the fact
that in terms of Section 29 (f) of
Ordinance 19 of 1974, the hunting of any
wild animal “by means of any weapon in a
public place within the area of
jurisdiction of a local authority”, is
prohibited. Furthermore, the hunting
season can be regionally applicable,
such that certain areas are excluded and
where the relevant species may not be
hunted. The Cape Peninsula has
consequently been demarcated as such an
area where baboons may not be hunted
without a permit. However, when acting
in self-defence, to protect property as
human life from a potentially dangerous
wild animal, such as an adult baboon,
the use of a fire-arm might well be
could be considered as the only viable
solution under certain circumstances.
The responsibility of local authorities
to ensure safety and to provide security
to communities and constitutionally it
is the provision of both health and
safety measures to such communities.
When wildlife threatens the health of
humans by spreading diseases such as
rabies or physically threatens the
safety of humans by intruding into homes
or represents a security risk in public
places, the responsible local management
authority must take the necessary steps
to address such risks or threats,
including, amongst others, the
implementation of appropriate waste
removal management measures. The local
authority can be assisted in terms of
advice, equipment and the disposal of
certain captured animals. The
appropriate conservation frequency of
occurrence of problems with wild animals
will determine the level of assistance
and input by conservation staff. The
more frequent and involved the problem
is, the more independent and proficient
the local authority will have to become
to deal with it.
The primary responsibility of CapeNature
should thus be seen as advisory. For
this reason CapeNature has established
an internal help desk to provide the
necessary information when requested. It
is therefore important to differentiate
between physical control wild animals
causing damage in local authority areas
and the legislative responsibilities of
CapeNature. In this regard, CapeNature
is fully responsible for dealing with
any transgression of the ordinance or
provincial regulations regarding the
hunting, captivity, sale, breeding,
theft and transport of wild animals
within a municipal area. Similarly
CapeNature is responsible for
inspections and the necessary permit
administration within the Local
Authority area as well.
Although the operational management of
human-animal conflict falls outside the
mandate of CapeNature (this is the
responsibility of the land-owner), it
has been decided, as an interim
arrangement, to establish a baboon
monitoring project in the highly
problematic areas of Hermanus and the
Cape Peninsula as part of a poverty
relief programme (R3,5 million has been
made available for this purpose.) The
main objective with this interim and
urgent intervention is to ensure that a
problematic and successful baboon
management model is developed in areas
where high levels of conflict are
experienced. The relevant local
authorities will have to ensure that
this model becomes sustainable and that
they take the necessary responsibility
of the management of the baboon-human
conflict in their areas of jurisdiction.
|